The Integrated Leadership Model and Measure – bringing order into chaos?
Leadership is a topic which is high on the agenda for most organisations. It’s difficult to pick up a respectable magazine or journal and not find in it some reference.
The one thing we are not short of is leadership models and advice. There is a huge choice available and more emerge almost weekly.
All the models have appeal and most seem to contribute something to our understanding of leadership. This is particularly true of behavioural models. But there is very little solid objective evidence to support any one particular picture of leadership style and behaviour.
Another issue is that many of the models appear to overlap or look at the same aspect of leadership from a different perspective. The connections between models are rarely made.
Small wonder then that Augier and Teece said in 2005 “as a scientific concept, leadership is a mess”. Provoked by a discussion with the Institute of Leadership and Management searching for a leadership measure, AQR International launched a major study to examine these issues.
Carried out under the supervision of Professor Peter Clough, MMU, the study examined the main leadership models (academic and practitioner models) from around the world.
A key element was to analyse these models by stripping them down to their bare components.
The results were extremely interesting.
If one examines most popular leadership models they will have their roots in one or more of these six specific scales which appear to define leadership style.
Analysis showed that there is no particular combination of style which correlated uniquely with high performance. The indication is that leadership style is situational and it is adopted. Different profiles might work better in different situations.
Defining Leadership Effectiveness
Once the data analysis to confirm the specific scales had been completed a further analysis revealed that there were 3 over-arching (second order) core competencies of leadership effectiveness that emerged from the study.
These are shown below:
An important and valuable by product of the work carried out has led to the development of a normative questionnaire (ILM72) which can measures individuals (and organisations) in terms of the six specific scales (style) and the 3 global scales.
@ AQR International 2016.
AQR is a leading edge publisher of psychometric measures, we also work through partner organisations. For more information please visit www.aqrinternational.co.uk